Are you a mover or a quitter?

One of the things that never fails to surprise and disappoint me is when I hear that it’s easier to find a job elsewhere than to get one internally. 

Right now, the job market has roared past pre-pandemic levels.  Candidate mobility is also peaking. If you don’t have plans to give your restless Talent an internal move pretty soon, it’s safe to assume they might quit – and the market is definitely in their favour.

How to make a move

Internal movement has some natural barriers to overcome:

  • It’s not natural for a leader to want to let you go, it’s darn inconvenient. Only the good ones willingly sacrifice their convenience for your career.
  • We are all talent magpies – we like new, shiny things. It’s pretty tricky to reinvent yourself into a new shiny thing when you’re showing wear and tear – the stuff that a new employer can’t see, and your current employer can’t un-see.

But the other half of the failure to move is you:

  • Are you managing up so that you’re on the radar for the next gig? (or do you still think managing up means sucking up?)
  • Are you clear about your value proposition and actively seeking ways to reinvent yourself? 
  • If you’re concerned about past mistakes, address the elephant – find out what you can do to move past it.
  • Are you actively raising your reputation internally, or are you expecting others to notice you and a bit peeved when they don’t? 

How to be a good Quitter

So for those thinking of leaving, here’s a few tips on how to be a good Quitter:

  • No surprises – if your career plans are well known and your employer’s inability to meet them at this point in time is also understood, then your departure is inevitable, regrettable but not frictionful. Be transparent or at least, signal early.
  • There’s never a good time to quit, there’s only the least worst – minimise the damage using levers like start dates, succession and risk mitigation plans. Letting the wheels fall off to prove a point might sound deliciously satisfying but it’s not the legacy of a good leader.
  • Don’t make it personal – allowing personal drama to spill over into a professional exit is a scorched earth tactic. Sure, it hurts your enemy (which is why many throw down criticism on their way out of the door) but it does even more damage to those left behind – your team.
  • Don’t take it personally – While you’ve been sweating over this decision for weeks, the moment you resign people appear to move on in a nanosecond – it’s suddenly all about them. Your team are thinking OMG, who will be my next boss? Your peers are thinking, bugger, do I have to build that trust up all over again? Your boss is thinking, crap, that’s bad timing how will I cope? It’s not personal, it’s just survival so be compassionate and let them be self-centred for a while.

This post originally appeared on Bold HR and has been republished here with permission.

Image Source: Shutterstock

Article By

Get more articles direct to your inbox

Upcoming Events

Annual Conference: ATC2026 UPLIFT

13 & 14 October 2026

AI Uplift Workshop: Play Ball with AI

September and October 2026

Download the 2026 State of Talent Acquisition Report

You may also enjoy reading...

Discover the top 7 TA and HR podcasts for ANZ and global talent leaders. Benchmark your hiring strategy with insights from TaPod, Edan Haddock - Total Talent, bAIbes, and more on TA strategy and AI tech.
The shift to becoming a Skills-Based Organisation sounds straightforward: understand the skills you have, identify the capabilities you need, and use that insight to make better workforce decisions. In practice, getting there requires changes to how organisations think about jobs, workforce planning, learning, technology and, importantly, the role of Talent Acquisition. For TA Teams, this creates an opportunity to move beyond replacing roles like-for-like and play a more active role in shaping the capabilities the organisation needs next. But what does that actually look like in practice?
Our recent LinkedIn poll surfaced an important mindset shift for Internal Talent Acquisition Teams. When asked who they saw as their ‘Customer’, the largest proportion of respondent (all Talent Acquisition Leaders and Senior Recruiters) chose ‘The Hiring Manager’. That perspective reflects a traditional recruitment model, where success is defined by responding well to a hiring request.