How to derive Cost per Hire (CpH) metrics

In our recent webinar discussion Metrics that Matter: The Reality behind Recruitment Performance, our panellists entered into a lively discussion about the function and efficacy of the Cost per Hire (CpH) metric.

Olga Barrett, Head of Talent Acquisition East Asia Pacific, Senior Manager at EPAM Systems explained that CpH is used as one of the key metrics for her function, in particular when benchmarking recruiting efficiency across different global regions and deciding on the architecture of the TA organisation. Here’s how that metric is derived. 

Our CpH is derived from two main components: Compensation and Operating Expenses.

Compensation includes payrolls, bonuses (contractual and performance-based), and payroll-related expenses. However, salaries paid to the hired candidates are not factored in, unless they are part of the TA team.

On the other hand, Operating Expenses encompass agencies, referral bonuses, sourcing costs, marketing and events, operations, contractors, travel and entertainment expenses, upskilling and development costs, software licenses, relocation fees (in cases where recruiters move between countries), and potential legal costs when engaging third parties or an Employer of Record (EoR).

To calculate CpH, the total of Compensation and Operating Expenses is divided by the number of hires forecasted.

In this way, we can keep a keen eye on the cost-effectiveness of our talent acquisition efforts and ensures efficient allocation of resources within our TA function.

Watch the full discussion
Metrics that Matter: The reality behind recruitment performance

Download the slide deck.

Article By

Get more articles direct to your inbox

Upcoming Events

AI Uplift Workshop: Play Ball with AI

Tuesday, 27 October 2026

The Contingent Workforce Forum 2027

Thursday, 18 March 2027

The Contingent Workforce Survey

Open Now

CWF2026 Survey

You may also enjoy reading...

With approximately 35,000 employees across more than 20 countries, Arcadis set out to move beyond traditional job titles and change how it identifies, develops and deploys talent. I share nine lessons from Hugh Ragg’s ATC2026 session on Arcadis’s four-year skills-powered transformation, covering Eightfold, skills visibility, internal mobility, personalised learning, workforce planning and leadership ownership.
CPP operates in one of Australia’s most constrained labour markets. The national energy transition is accelerating demand for engineering, construction and infrastructure professionals at a rate that the available talent market cannot easily support. Historically, success was measured by vacancies filled. Today, success is also measured by our ability to influence workforce strategy, challenge hiring assumptions and help leaders make decisions based on talent market realities.
I am old enough to remember recruiting before any ATS systems or computers. We had file cabinets, folders, and Rolodexes for contact information. I think it was around 1990 when Resumix, one of the first ATSs, appeared. Its resume-parsing/extraction technology promised to make it easy to search resumes and connect with candidates. It was revolutionary and exciting. We felt like we were on the cusp of an easier, more automated life. It didn’t prove to be either easier or more automated. It actually created more work. Not much different in a way than some recruiters now feel about AI.