How to derive Cost per Hire (CpH) metrics

In our recent webinar discussion Metrics that Matter: The Reality behind Recruitment Performance, our panellists entered into a lively discussion about the function and efficacy of the Cost per Hire (CpH) metric.

Olga Barrett, Head of Talent Acquisition East Asia Pacific, Senior Manager at EPAM Systems explained that CpH is used as one of the key metrics for her function, in particular when benchmarking recruiting efficiency across different global regions and deciding on the architecture of the TA organisation. Here’s how that metric is derived. 

Our CpH is derived from two main components: Compensation and Operating Expenses.

Compensation includes payrolls, bonuses (contractual and performance-based), and payroll-related expenses. However, salaries paid to the hired candidates are not factored in, unless they are part of the TA team.

On the other hand, Operating Expenses encompass agencies, referral bonuses, sourcing costs, marketing and events, operations, contractors, travel and entertainment expenses, upskilling and development costs, software licenses, relocation fees (in cases where recruiters move between countries), and potential legal costs when engaging third parties or an Employer of Record (EoR).

To calculate CpH, the total of Compensation and Operating Expenses is divided by the number of hires forecasted.

In this way, we can keep a keen eye on the cost-effectiveness of our talent acquisition efforts and ensures efficient allocation of resources within our TA function.

Watch the full discussion
Metrics that Matter: The reality behind recruitment performance

Download the slide deck.

Article By

Get more articles direct to your inbox

Upcoming Events

Annual Conference: ATC2026 UPLIFT

13 & 14 October 2026

AI Uplift Workshop: Play Ball with AI

September and October 2026

Download the 2026 State of Talent Acquisition Report

You may also enjoy reading...

Our recent LinkedIn poll surfaced an important mindset shift for Internal Talent Acquisition Teams. When asked who they saw as their ‘Customer’, the largest proportion of respondent (all Talent Acquisition Leaders and Senior Recruiters) chose ‘The Hiring Manager’. That perspective reflects a traditional recruitment model, where success is defined by responding well to a hiring request.
As organisations rethink how work gets done, the boundaries between Human Resources, Talent Acquisition, Learning and Development, and the emerging discipline of Talent Architecture and Orchestration are becoming less clear. This operating model provides a practical comparison of each function’s purpose, trigger point, responsibilities, risks and measures of success.
Your workforce strategy is the engine that powers your organisational goals and when you align how you find people with where the company is headed, TA becomes a primary driver of business success. Yet many teams still face fragmented systems, limited talent visibility, and processes that struggle to keep pace. The next phase of Talent…