How to derive Cost per Hire (CpH) metrics

In our recent webinar discussion Metrics that Matter: The Reality behind Recruitment Performance, our panellists entered into a lively discussion about the function and efficacy of the Cost per Hire (CpH) metric.

Olga Barrett, Head of Talent Acquisition East Asia Pacific, Senior Manager at EPAM Systems explained that CpH is used as one of the key metrics for her function, in particular when benchmarking recruiting efficiency across different global regions and deciding on the architecture of the TA organisation. Here’s how that metric is derived. 

Our CpH is derived from two main components: Compensation and Operating Expenses.

Compensation includes payrolls, bonuses (contractual and performance-based), and payroll-related expenses. However, salaries paid to the hired candidates are not factored in, unless they are part of the TA team.

On the other hand, Operating Expenses encompass agencies, referral bonuses, sourcing costs, marketing and events, operations, contractors, travel and entertainment expenses, upskilling and development costs, software licenses, relocation fees (in cases where recruiters move between countries), and potential legal costs when engaging third parties or an Employer of Record (EoR).

To calculate CpH, the total of Compensation and Operating Expenses is divided by the number of hires forecasted.

In this way, we can keep a keen eye on the cost-effectiveness of our talent acquisition efforts and ensures efficient allocation of resources within our TA function.

Watch the full discussion
Metrics that Matter: The reality behind recruitment performance

Download the slide deck.

Article By

Get more articles direct to your inbox

Upcoming Events

Long Lunch Series for Talent Leaders

Ongoing

Restaurant Bar
ATC2025 Annual Conference

28 & 29 October

TA Brew for Internal Talent Teams

Ongoing

You may also enjoy reading...

Thinking of hiring in APAC? Forget one-size-fits-all. From China to Vietnam, Singapore to Japan, every market moves to its own beat - culturally, economically, and legally. What worked yesterday won’t work today, and what works here might fail there. Talent pools shift, policies tighten, and candidates’ priorities evolve faster than most playbooks can keep up. Dive in to uncover the realities, myths, and strategies that actually work when expanding across East Asia - warts, wins, and all.
Too often 'Agile' means 'we have no deadlines or planning', 'we react to every whim', 'need for speed, quality is secondary'. In fact, any mess can be justified as an 'Agile approach', and if you dare ask for structure or sanity, you risk being labelled 'rigid'. The Agile Manifesto, born when developers, sick of siloed work, realised the only way to satisfy customers was through collaboration. With geographical expansion, demand surges and spikes, high volume of niche roles and business pressures to keep productivity up and cost per hire down came some big changes. Working just in your locale with occasional 'support' from others was not an option anymore. Before adopting Agile, we had to embody its core principle: being agile - able to move quickly and easily. When role surges hit, we assembled cross-border project teams (TA Leads, Ops, Sourcers, Marketing).
Discover how talent teams can future-proof strategy by using structured prompts to decode industry trends and uncover actionable insight. This TWIT reveals a powerful prompt used to analyse shifting trends, align workforce planning, and shape business decisions - ideal for HR, TA, and strategy leaders ready to lead with foresight, not hindsight.