Impact of Candidate Experience

This week in talent with Brand Kent - Week 24

How Talent Acquisition shapes lives, not just careers

In the world of Talent Acquisition, it’s easy to get caught up in metrics like time-to-fill, sourcing strategies, and headcount targets. But at the heart of every recruitment process is a human being, someone making a decision that could change their life. That’s why the candidate experience isn’t a “nice to have.” It’s a business-critical part of Talent Acquisition, and one that can make or break your ability to attract top talent.

As HR and recruitment professionals, we’re in the business of people and yet too often, the candidate experience is treated as a secondary priority behind speed, volume, and process efficiency. But here’s the truth: the way we treat candidates has a direct and lasting impact on employer brand, talent pipelines, and the overall reputation of our function. Candidate experience isn’t just a reflection of our processes, it’s a reflection of our culture.

If we want to attract and retain top talent, create advocates for our organisation, and deliver genuine value to the business, it’s time to put candidate experience front and centre.

 

Why candidate experience matters

  1. First impressions last

The recruitment process is often a candidate’s first real interaction with your brand. From how the job ad is written, to how interviews are conducted, to the communication between stages, everything sends a message. A thoughtful, respectful experience builds trust and interest. A clunky, unresponsive one drives people away and not just from the job, but from your brand entirely.

  1. Talent talks and people listen

Thanks to platforms like Glassdoor, LinkedIn, and SEEK reviews, candidate experiences are no longer private. Job seekers share their stories both good and bad which shape your employer brand in powerful ways. A consistently poor experience can erode your talent pool. A great experience turns even unsuccessful candidates into advocates.

In a tight market, experience is a differentiator. Candidates who feel respected, informed, and engaged are more likely to accept offers even when competing opportunities exist. Conversely, a slow or impersonal process sends top talent elsewhere. We’re not just competing on salary and benefits; we’re competing on how we make people feel.

  1. The emotional journey

Job searching is personal. It involves hope, uncertainty, and sometimes rejection. A transparent, empathetic process acknowledges the emotional investment candidates make. It shows respect for their time, aspirations, and individuality. That human touch builds goodwill which is remembered long after the process ends.

  1. Candidate = Customer = Future Employee or Brand Advocate or Referrer

In many industries, candidates are also customers or influencers. Treating them poorly can damage broader brand perception and loyalty. Treating them well builds affinity. And even if they don’t get the job, they might apply again, refer others, or become brand champions. 

Not everyone we engage will be hired but every candidate forms an opinion. Some may apply again. Some may even refer others in their network. Some may be future customers or partners. The ripple effect is real. A positive experience builds relationships. A poor one breaks them.

  1. Competitive advantage in a tight market

When talent is scarce, the candidate experience becomes a differentiator. A seamless, engaging process can sway top talent who are weighing multiple offers. It signals a company that values people and that culture starts before day one.

  1. Measure it

We can (and should) treat candidate experience like any other business metric. Tools like candidate NPS, feedback surveys, and rejection follow-ups provide actionable data. When we measure and improve experience consistently, we strengthen our function’s reputation and influence.

 

What makes a great candidate experience?

  • Clear communication: Set expectations about timelines and processes. Keep candidates informed at every stage, even when there’s no update.
  • Timeliness: Delays kill momentum. Fast, efficient processes show respect and organisational agility.
  • Personalisation: Treat candidates as individuals, not numbers. Tailor communications and give relevant feedback where possible.
  • Transparency: Be honest about the role, culture, and challenges. Authenticity builds trust.
  • Closure: Don’t leave candidates in limbo. Give closure whether it’s a job offer or a kind, respectful rejection.

 

The role of TA in owning the experience

Talent Acquisition professionals are the bridge between a company and its future workforce. We set the tone, manage expectations, and shape the journey. When done well, TA doesn’t just fill roles, it creates advocates, strengthens the brand, and leaves a lasting impression on the people it touches.

We’re ambassadors of the organisation, shaping perception, building trust, and influencing long-term talent outcomes. When candidate experience is done well, it builds advocacy, increases offer acceptance rates, and contributes to better retention. When done poorly, it damages brand equity and makes our jobs harder.

If we want to be seen as strategic partners (and not just order-takers) then candidate experience is one of the most powerful levers we have.

 

What impact has it had for Unitywater?

Huge impact from a TA strategy perspective.  Very early on when the Circle Back Initiative was started, we were early adopters and advocates, being one of the first 10 employers in the country to sign up.  We were an evolving TA function and as previously stated Candidate = Customer rings true as most of our team members are also customers. We needed to live our values in the recruitment process.

Subsequently we also started surveying candidates, setting up our own survey questions through Survey Monkey and using the functionality in our ATS  to gather feedback from different stages.  The flow-on effect from this has been we were able to identify pain points and gather data on our process.  Some of them we knew and we were working towards, some we didn’t know and had to change.

This has also helped support business cases for change in process, vendors, tech and various parts of TA strategy. 

Also the team has won awards, been consistently recognised and I have been offered opportunities to speak at various forums, podcasts and the like on the back of some of this recognition. 

We haven’t quite caught Nick and his team from Jumbo who do an amazing job.  But we’re coming….

Aside from this looking at my own experiences applying for jobs and how dehumanising it can feel, it’s just the right thing to do.

 

Putting people at the centre

A candidate may only spend a few weeks in your recruitment process but how they’re treated in that time matters. It affects their decision to join, their engagement once they do, and how they speak about your brand in the world. Great candidate experience is more than a process; it’s a reflection of your culture.

In the end, Talent Acquisition is about more than hiring. It’s about relationships, trust, and humanity. And when candidates are treated with care, transparency, and respect, everyone wins – the candidate, the recruiter, and the business.

Article By

Get more articles direct to your inbox

Upcoming Events

Long Lunch Series for Talent Leaders

Ongoing

Restaurant Bar
ATC2025 Annual Conference

28 & 29 October

TA Brew for Internal Talent Teams

Ongoing

You may also enjoy reading...

TA leaders often fight for credibility despite driving revenue through strategic hiring. This is my take on how to quantify TA's business impact, shift from order-taker to advisor, and build data-driven operations, calculate hiring ROI, optimise budgets, and position TA as a profit centre - not just overhead.
Too often 'Agile' means 'we have no deadlines or planning', 'we react to every whim', 'need for speed, quality is secondary'. In fact, any mess can be justified as an 'Agile approach', and if you dare ask for structure or sanity, you risk being labelled 'rigid'. The Agile Manifesto, born when developers, sick of siloed work, realised the only way to satisfy customers was through collaboration. With geographical expansion, demand surges and spikes, high volume of niche roles and business pressures to keep productivity up and cost per hire down came some big changes. Working just in your locale with occasional 'support' from others was not an option anymore. Before adopting Agile, we had to embody its core principle: being agile - able to move quickly and easily. When role surges hit, we assembled cross-border project teams (TA Leads, Ops, Sourcers, Marketing).
Skills-based recruitment has become increasingly popular in the last few years, and for a good reason. We are looking at a range of sizeable benefits that happen to be especially relevant in the world of the gig-economy upsurge and talent scarcity. After we finally admitted that the past does not necessarily define the future, and that lie detectors and psychological testing can predict one’s success only slightly better than astrology and fortune telling, many companies came to realise that when done right, skills-based recruitment is quite cost-effective. And indeed, what is there not to love?