Let’s Make 2025 the Year We Ban “Doing More with Less” (and What to Do Instead)

Image credit: Canva

If you’ve heard this directive at work, you’re not alone. Typically, it revolves around two main drivers:

  • Budget Cuts: Financial challenges, such as reduced revenue, economic downturns, or cost-cutting initiatives.
  • Profit Maximisation: Prioritising profitability for owners and shareholders by reducing operational costs, often at the expense of employee well-being or resources.

The other key factor that allows this toxic directive to thrive is:

  • Failure to Manage: A leader assumes “doing more with less” simply means being ultra-lean, without delving deeper to understand or address the situation.

While there may be legitimate opportunities to trim non-essential spending, this is rarely the true meaning of “doing more with less.” In reality, it often translates to:

  • “Your resource requests are denied, all spending is frozen, but we still expect you to deliver everything regardless.”

If this approach is enforced, the consequences can be damaging:

The Consequences of “Doing More with Less”

  1. Unrealistic Expectations
    It assumes individuals or teams can endlessly increase productivity, ignoring the physical and emotional toll this imposes.
  2. Disregard for Resource Needs
    It undervalues the necessity of proper tools, training, or sufficient headcount, forcing people to compensate for organisational shortcomings.
  3. Eroded Morale
    Employees may feel undervalued, overburdened, and unappreciated, which can lead to disengagement or turnover.
  4. Sacrificed Quality and Long-term Goals
    In the rush to “do more,” quality, innovation, and long-term sustainability often take a back seat.
  5. Ignored Root Causes
    This approach addresses symptoms (e.g., resource constraints) rather than tackling root issues like poor planning, inefficiency, or mismanagement.

What to Do and Say Instead

Replace the mindset of “doing more with less” by fostering strategic thinking and encouraging leaders to evaluate what’s essential versus “nice-to-have.”

1. Focus on Prioritisation

Instead of demanding more output, identify high-value tasks or projects and eliminate lower-priority ones.

  • Say: “Let’s review what matters most and ensure we allocate our efforts in the right direction.”

2. Empower Through Support

Provide the necessary tools, training, or team members to achieve goals realistically.

  • Say: “How can we support you to achieve these goals with the resources available? What frustrations, delays, or other issues can we alleviate for you?”

3. Set New Expectations

Acknowledge resource constraints and work collaboratively to address them.

  • Say: “Given our current capacity, let’s define what success looks like realistically. Let’s review delivery timeframes.”

4. Build a Business Case for Innovation

Use the situation as an opportunity to propose long-term, innovative solutions.

  • Say: “We can deliver significant savings to the organisation over time if we invest in automating repetitious tasks now. While we may not save $XX by XX date, we can achieve larger, sustained savings of $XX by XX date if we innovate now.”

Why Great Leaders Reject “Doing More with Less”

Great leaders understand that this mindset is unsustainable and counterproductive. They:

  • Recognise the limits of productivity and the potential harm to their teams.
  • Avoid overpromising and underdelivering.
  • Protect their team’s well-being and ensure sustainable performance.

While these conversations may feel awkward or confrontational, reframing them as “important conversations for everyone involved” can help you lead with confidence.

Lead with Impact

Great leaders focus on creating environments where teams can thrive, innovate, deliver high-quality results, and sustain performance over time—all while presenting alternative solutions to the business.

Let’s make 2025 the year we leave behind the toxic narrative of “doing more with less” and instead prioritise sustainable, strategic, and people-focused approaches.

Article By

Get more articles direct to your inbox

Upcoming Events

Long Lunch Series for Talent Leaders

Ongoing

Restaurant Bar
ATC2025 Annual Conference

28 & 29 October

TA Brew for Internal Talent Teams

Ongoing

You may also enjoy reading...

Want to know what everyone in TA is thinking about right now, and how your Talent Team compares? In March 2025, we surveyed 151 Talent Acquisition Leaders from some of Australia’s largest employers to uncover how they’re managing high-volume hiring in 2025. We investigated the balance between automation and human touch, key hiring metrics, and…
TA leaders often fight for credibility despite driving revenue through strategic hiring. This is my take on how to quantify TA's business impact, shift from order-taker to advisor, and build data-driven operations, calculate hiring ROI, optimise budgets, and position TA as a profit centre - not just overhead.
Skills-based recruitment has become increasingly popular in the last few years, and for a good reason. We are looking at a range of sizeable benefits that happen to be especially relevant in the world of the gig-economy upsurge and talent scarcity. After we finally admitted that the past does not necessarily define the future, and that lie detectors and psychological testing can predict one’s success only slightly better than astrology and fortune telling, many companies came to realise that when done right, skills-based recruitment is quite cost-effective. And indeed, what is there not to love?